By Paul Hurley
Consequentialism, the speculation that morality calls for us to advertise the easiest total consequence, is the default replacement in modern ethical philosophy, and is very influential in public discourses past educational philosophy. Paul Hurley argues that present discussions of the problem consequentialism are likely to disregard a primary problem to consequentialism. the traditional consequentialist account of the content material of morality, he argues, can't be reconciled to the authoritativeness of ethical criteria for rational brokers. If rational brokers often have decisive purposes to do what morality calls for, then consequentialism can't be the proper account of ethical criteria. Hurley builds upon this problem to argue that the consequentialist case for grounding the neutral review of activities within the neutral overview of results is outfitted upon a collection of sophisticated and collectively reinforcing errors. via exposing those errors and misappropriations, he undermines consequentialist arguments opposed to substitute methods that realize a perception of impartiality applicable to the review of activities that's precise from the impartiality acceptable to the evaluate of results. an ethical thought that acknowledges a basic position for any such specific perception of impartiality can account for the rational authority of ethical criteria, yet does so, Hurley argues, by way of taking morality past consequentialism in either its common and non-standard varieties.
Read or Download Beyond Consequentialism PDF
Similar consciousness & thought books
Taking into consideration major advancements within the metaphysical considering E. J. Lowe over the last twenty years, extra types of Being:A extra learn of Individuation, identification, and the common sense of Sortal phrases provides an intensive transforming and enlargement of the 1989 variation of types of Being. Brings the various unique rules and arguments placed forth in types of Being completely brand new in mild of recent advancements contains a thorough transforming and enlargement of the sooner paintings, instead of only a new version displays the author's conversion to what he calls 'the four-category ontology,' a metaphysical procedure that takes its proposal from Aristotle presents a unified dialogue of individuation and id that are supposed to end up to be crucial interpreting for philosophers operating in metaphysics.
The 1st anthology explicitly devoted to Hegel’s linguistic notion, Hegel and Language provides a number of aspects of a brand new wave of Hegel scholarship. The chapters are equipped round topics that come with the opportunity of systematic philosophy, fact and objectivity, and the relation of Hegel’s concept to analytic and postmodern techniques to language.
Klagge attracts at the complete variety of proof, together with Wittgenstein's released paintings, correspondence, lectures, and conversations to put Wittgenstein's paintings in a huge context alongside a trajectory of concept that comes with activity, Goethe, and Dostoyevsky.
- Sexual Deceit: The Ethics of Passing
- Seeds of Consciousness: The Wisdom of Sri Nisargadatta Maharaj
- Descartes's Dualism
- Virtual Selves, Real Persons: A Dialogue across Disciplines
Extra resources for Beyond Consequentialism
I take this to indicate a substantive disagreement concerning whether such distributional considerations can properly be understood as among the impartial outcome-given considerations to which a consequentialist account of moral standards is typically taken to be restricted. Rawls takes it to be the case that such distributional considerations are properly understood as appeals to impartial considerations which, like standard appeals to rights, are not in the relevant sense outcomegiven. Parﬁt holds that such distributional concerns can be among the relevant outcome-given impartial considerations.
See, for example, David Gauthier’s contemporary Hobbesian account (1986), and discussions of Hobbes’ own moral theory by Stephen Darwall (1998, ch. 10) and Christine Korsgaard (1996a, pp. ) ⁶ I use the qualiﬁer ‘‘traditional’’ here to distinguish such accounts from more recent ‘‘neo-Kantian’’ alternatives that avoid the adoption of central aspects of Kant’s account of practical reason. 3. Developments of various aspects of such traditional Kantian accounts can be found in Barbara Herman (1993) and Onora O’Neill (1989).
It is shown that a reinterpretation of one standard argument that there is no rationale for agent-centered restrictions instead provides an attractive rationale for such restrictions. This rationale suggests that although the impersonal conception of impartiality is appropriate for the impartial evaluation of overall states 34 beyond consequentialism of affairs, it is not the conception of impartiality that is appropriate for the impartial evaluation of actions; moreover, it provides the outlines of the conception of impartiality, an interpersonal conception, that is appropriate for the impartial evaluation of actions as right and wrong.
Beyond Consequentialism by Paul Hurley